Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Cathrine DegnenORCiD
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Generation or relative age is a common way humans define social difference. In Europe and North America, old age is frequently perceived as a period of decline and loss, a condition ‘successful aging’ paradigms exhort individuals to avoid for as long as possible. Explicit and implicit ageist beliefs, discourses, and practices marginalize later life, portraying it as undesirable and inferior. This paper explores how imagined generational relationships with time – younger people as future facing, older people as ‘out’ of time – enrol linear, future-oriented temporal perspectives in reproducing ageism. The aftermath of the Brexit referendum followed closely by the covid-19 pandemic serve as my ethnographic examples. These two extraordinary events permit me to highlight how chronocracy (Kirtsoglou and Simpson 2020) – that is, the denial of coevalness or coexistence in time through everyday temporal regimes – reinforces unequal power dynamics, and to explore how generational groups are differently valued in contemporary England.
Author(s): Degnen C
Publication type: Article
Publication status: In Press
Journal: Cultural Anthropology
Year: 2026
Acceptance date: 24/06/2025
ISSN (print): 0886-7356
ISSN (electronic): 1548-1360
Publisher: American Anthropological Association
Notes: May 2026 estimated time of publication
